Haydn and Orfeo a classical myth
![]() |
Joseph Haydn |
As in Armida, Haydn and his librettist, Carlo Franceso Badini, did away with that dreadful happy end which disfigures Glucks opera on the subject. Returning to the original legend, Orfeo is poisoned by the baccanti and, as they, shrieking with delight, prepare to tear him into pieces the river Lethe rises up in anger and drowns the frenzied women. At the end, the storm gradually sinks away, leaving the stage empty and dark, while the remains of Orfeo are carried away by the waters, to find rest on the Isle of Lesbos.
Haydn uses the chorus in this opera in the manner of a Greek tragedy: to comment on the action and, occasionally, to take part in it as amorini or baccanti. The chorus, as might be expected from a composer who loved the choir and was prevented from using it at Esterhaza by the fact that there was none, plays a decisive rle in Orfeo, and many of the finest pieces are choral. A striking effect is obtained by using, at the beginning of the opera, Euridice together with the chorus in a furious C minor Vivace. Euridice interrupts them, crying Deh, per pieta, Lasciatemi!, but the chorus cuts her off, warning her again, Ferma il piede, o Principessa!
One curious, and in Haydns earlier operas unrevealed, trait stands out in this opera: the composers uncanny ability to create a doom-ridden atmosphere. The music tells us again and again how this drama will end; in the beautiful E major Aria of Creonte in Act I (Il pensier sta negli oggetti), there is a sudden and sinister pianissimo hush, and the double basses enter like a great cloud over the peaceful arabesques of flute and strings. In Orfeos first scena in Act I (with solo harp, by the way), there is the same interruption before the end of the aria proper. And even in the happy love duet between Orfeo and Euridice at the end of Act I, Haydn stops to introduce this chilling presentiment of the actions outcome. Technically, this presence of doom is often achieved by the same means: the music stops, and then the double basses enter on the dominant with soft repeated quavers (or whatever the basic quick pulse may be) whilst the upper parts then slide across the texture with diminished seventh chords which do indeed have a peculiarly ominous effect.
In summing up, it is quite obvious that Lanima del filosofo is one of Haydns most impressive works and likewise one of the great monuments to opera seria; if it fails as opera, it fails magnificently, as did Idomeneo. Yet despite its disability to succeed as a stage piece it rounds out, in a curious way, Haydns activities as an operatic composer. It will no longer be possible to consider Haydn in London without Lanima del filosofo; and I think Haydn, who was the most modest and self-critical of all composers, would be satisfied with that.
